Skip to main content

Decreasing Ruffed Grouse Habitat

The male Ruffed Grouse’s ideal mating habitat is dwindling. In the 1980s and 1990s the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Wildlife Bureau recognized that our forests were changing drastically. In 2005, they developed “Forest Wildlife Stewardship Plans” which are long-term plans which look at inventory for what we have for forest resources (trees and shrubs), developing objectives for that particular area, and writing prescriptions for forest management for the needed habitats for wildlife. According to these management inventories, in the 1970s or 1980s young forest habitats for Ruffed Grouse and other birds measured 25-45%. In 2010, only 1-3% of this young forest habitat was available after maturing forests caused decline of the Ruffed Grouse. To increase bird habitat, an effort is underway to expand and create new young forest. For the Ruffed Grouse, a critical step is cutting down mature Aspen trees to create early successional habitat. New seedlings will sprout from the root systems of the mature Aspen trees that are cut down. This will create the necessary habitat for wildlife species that need a young forest. Other trees needed for an ideal habitat include Red Cedars, Young Oak, Hazelnut, Dogwood, and Plum. Shrubs provide not only shelter from predators but also a food source from the berries they produce. Private landowners can help by bringing young forests onto their land and help bring the Ruffed Grouse Habitat back.

Location
Northeast Iowa

Possible Guiding, Compelling and/or Anchoring Questions

  • What physical components of the ecosystem appear to change over the last several decades?
  • Why is the Ruffed Grouse Habitat a concern to wildlife biologists?
  • What is the relationship between the number of Ruffed Grouse and the percentage of available habitat?

Classroom Suggestions

  • List evidence from the video that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affect populations.
  • Research evidence that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affects populations. Support the evidence with scientific reasoning.
  • Construct an argument supported by empirical evidence that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affect the Ruffed Grouse populations (or organisms in general).

Related Resources

Iowa Core Alignment

MS-LS2-4:

Construct an argument supported by empirical evidence that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affect populations

Credit Info

Media produced for Iowa Outdoors by Iowa PBS.

Submitted by Chantel Karns and Olivia Tebben as part of their Iowa STEM Teacher Externship experience at Iowa PBS.

REAPCorporation for Public BroadcastingAlliant EnergyMusco Lighting Pella